{"id":5388,"date":"2009-11-24T11:01:35","date_gmt":"2009-11-24T14:01:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/planetaorganico.com.br\/site\/?p=5388"},"modified":"2009-11-24T11:01:35","modified_gmt":"2009-11-24T14:01:35","slug":"produtos-agricolas-organicos-brasil-sobe-para-a-quinta-posicao-em-extensao-de-area-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/planetaorganico.agropecuaria.ws\/index.php\/produtos-agricolas-organicos-brasil-sobe-para-a-quinta-posicao-em-extensao-de-area-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Produtos Agr\u00edcolas Org\u00e2nicos: Brasil sobe para a quinta posi\u00e7\u00e3o em extens\u00e3o de \u00e1rea"},"content":{"rendered":"

Autor: Richard Domingues Dulley<\/strong> (dulley@iea.sp.gov.br<\/a>)
Data de publica\u00e7\u00e3o: 08\/09\/2005<\/strong>\u00a0<\/p>\n

A produ\u00e7\u00e3o agr\u00edcola org\u00e2nica no mundo, em termos de \u00e1rea, teria passado de cerca de 15,8 milh\u00f5es de hectares, no ano 2000, para cerca de 26,5 milh\u00f5es de hectares em 2004, abrangendo cerca de 558 mil estabelecimentos agr\u00edcolas, segundo o \u00faltimo relat\u00f3rio de Willer, H. e Yussef, M. (The World of Organic Agriculture Statistics and Emerging Trends da Funda\u00e7\u00e3o alem\u00e3 \u00d6kologie&Landbau – Foundation Ecology & Agriculture) (tabela 1). Esse mesmo relat\u00f3rio (2005) informa que, para 2003, se estimou a expans\u00e3o das vendas em torno de 7% a 9%, a partir do relat\u00f3rio para o ano de 2002 elaborado pela UNCTAD (Organic food and beverages: world supply and major. European Market. Geneva: ITC, UNCTAD\/WTO 2003). 1<\/p>\n

Este texto procurou apresentar para o p\u00fablico uma s\u00edntese das informa\u00e7\u00f5es contidas nos dois primeiros cap\u00edtulos do mais recente relat\u00f3rio (fevereiro de 2005), dispon\u00edveis gratuitamente na Internet em http:\/\/www.soel.de\/oekolandbau\/weltweit.html. Foram consultadas tamb\u00e9m informa\u00e7\u00f5es constantes de relat\u00f3rios anteriores dessa institui\u00e7\u00e3o, dispon\u00edveis integralmente tamb\u00e9m nesse site e outros trabalhos relevantes sobre a tem\u00e1tica.<\/p>\n

Tamb\u00e9m de acordo com a companhia de consultores Organic Monitor, as vendas mundiais de org\u00e2nicos estariam crescendo cerca de 5 % a 7 % em 2004. Assumem que em 2003 as vendas alcan\u00e7aram cerca de 25 milh\u00f5es de d\u00f3lares e cerca de 26,5 milh\u00f5es de d\u00f3lares em 2004. Portanto, as duas diferentes e principais fontes de dados indicam n\u00fameros aproximados para a varia\u00e7\u00e3o de \u00e1reas entre os relat\u00f3rios dos anos 2000 a 2005.<\/p>\n

O crescimento da produ\u00e7\u00e3o org\u00e2nica e desse mercado ocorre em todo o mundo. Os maiores mercados est\u00e3o situados na Europa e nos Estados Unidos da Am\u00e9rica, que representam mais de 90% das receitas auferidas nesse setor. O mercado europeu, em torno de 3,1 milh\u00f5es de euros, seria o maior depois do norte-americano. Da\u00ed a import\u00e2ncia desses dois mercados para o desenvolvimento da agricultura org\u00e2nica.<\/p>\n

Tabela 1 – Vis\u00e3o geral do mercado mundial de bebidas e alimentos org\u00e2nicos<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Pa\u00eds<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Vendas no varejo em milh\u00f5es de US$ no ano 2000<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Previs\u00e3o de vendas para o ano 2003 em milh\u00f5es de US$<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

% do total aproximada de vendas de alimentos<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Expectativa de % de crescimento de vendas no varejo de 2003-2005<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Europa<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6.950-7650<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

10.000-11.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

–<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

–<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Alemanha<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6.950-7.650<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.800-3.100<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.0-2.5<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5-10<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

It\u00e1lia<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1.000-1.050<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1.250-1.400<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1.0-1.5<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5-15<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Fran\u00e7a<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

800-850<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1.200-1.300<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1.0-1.5<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5-10<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Gr\u00e3 \u2013 Bretanha<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1.100-1.200<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1.550-1.750<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1.8-2.3<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

10-15<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Su\u00ed\u00e7a<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

450-475<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

725-775<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.5-3.0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5-15<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Holanda<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

275-325<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

425-475<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1.0-1.5<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5-10<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Dinamarca<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

350-375<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

350-375<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.5-3.0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0-5<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

\u00c1ustria<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

200-225<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

325-375<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.5-3.0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5-10<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Su\u00e9cia<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

175-225<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

350-400<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1.5-2.0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

10-15<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

B\u00e9lgica<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

100-125<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

200-250<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1.0-1.5<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5-10<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Outros pa\u00edses EU*<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

400-600<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

790-900<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

–<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

–<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

USA<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

7.500-8.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

11.000-13.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.0-2.5<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

15-20<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Canada<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

500<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

850-1.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1.5-2.0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

10-20<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Jap\u00e3o<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

225-325<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

350-450<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

< 0.5<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

–<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Oceania<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

75-100<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

< 0.5<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

–<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Total<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

15.225-16.475<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

23.000-25.000<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

–<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

* Finl\u00e2ndia, Gr\u00e9cia, Irlanda, Noruega, Portugal e Espanha
Fonte: UNCTAD (2004)2 – ITC compilado em janeiro de 2003<\/strong><\/p>\n

A tabela 1 mostra a percentagem das vendas de org\u00e2nicos agr\u00edcolas por pa\u00eds em rela\u00e7\u00e3o \u00e0s vendas totais de alimentos em cada pa\u00eds. Grosso modo, poderia se afirmar que as vendas de org\u00e2nicos agr\u00edcolas correspondem a cerca de 2 % do total.As \u00e1reas com produ\u00e7\u00e3o agr\u00edcola org\u00e2nica no mundo estariam assim distribu\u00eddas nos anos 2000, 2003 e 2004 (tabela 2):<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Continente<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

% de \u00e1rea ocupada com produ\u00e7\u00e3o agr\u00edcola org\u00e2nica<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Ano<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2000<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2003<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2004<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Oceania<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

48.51<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

41.80<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

42.90\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Europa<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

23.58<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

23.10<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

23.80\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Am\u00e9rica latina<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20.02<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

24.20<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

23.50<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Am\u00e9rica do norte<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

7.42<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5.90<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5.50<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

\u00c1sia<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0.33<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3.70<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.80<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

\u00c1frica<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0.14<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1.30<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1.60<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Fonte: elaborado a partir dos relat\u00f3rios anuais de Willer, H e Yussef , M. (2001), (2004) e (2005)
<\/strong>
<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

A Oceania ocupa o primeiro lugar na distribui\u00e7\u00e3o das \u00e1reas por continente devido em grande parte \u00e0 participa\u00e7\u00e3o da Austr\u00e1lia, pa\u00eds com a maior \u00e1rea org\u00e2nica. Esse continente tinha em 2000 cerca 48,51% da \u00e1rea org\u00e2nica plantada no mundo, contabilizando os 7,655 milh\u00f5es de hectares da Austr\u00e1lia, em rela\u00e7\u00e3o aos 15,814 milh\u00f5es estimados para o mundo. Em 2004, o percentual desse continente caiu para 42,90 %, mesmo contendo os 11,300 milh\u00f5es de hectares da Austr\u00e1lia para um total no mundo de 26,458 milh\u00f5es de hectares de agricultura org\u00e2nica.<\/p>\n

A Argentina, que apresentava em 2000 cerca de 3 milh\u00f5es de hectares, teve as estimativas reduzidas no relat\u00f3rio de 2004 para 2,8 milh\u00f5es de hectares. O acr\u00e9scimo verificado no percentual da Am\u00e9rica Latina deve-se em grande parte \u00e0 inclus\u00e3o na \u00e1rea de org\u00e2nicos do Brasil das pastagens que at\u00e9 2000 n\u00e3o tinham sido consideradas. As dificuldades para se obter estat\u00edsticas sobre produ\u00e7\u00e3o agr\u00edcola org\u00e2nica ficam evidentes pelo tipo de varia\u00e7\u00f5es ocorridas nas informa\u00e7\u00f5es entre os relat\u00f3rios referentes aos anos 2000, 2003 e 2004 de Willer e Yussef.<\/p>\n

O quadro geral da situa\u00e7\u00e3o dos continentes, em rela\u00e7\u00e3o ao n\u00famero de estabelecimentos agr\u00edcolas conduzidos organicamente, \u00e0 quantidade de hectares org\u00e2nicos e \u00e0 \u00e1rea total agricultada apresentados por essas pesquisas, pode ser visto na tabela 3.<\/p>\n

Tabela 3 – Distribui\u00e7\u00e3o do n\u00famero de estabelecimentos agr\u00edcolas com produ\u00e7\u00e3o org\u00e2nica por continentes, em 2003 e 2004
<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Continente<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

% de n\u00famero de fazendas com produ\u00e7\u00e3o agr\u00edcola org\u00e2nica<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Ano<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2003<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2004<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Oceania<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0.50<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0.40<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Europa<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

37.70<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

29.90<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Am\u00e9rica latina<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

30.90<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

34.00<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Am\u00e9rica do norte<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.30<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.70<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

\u00c1sia<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

13.30<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

11.80<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

\u00c1frica<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

15.30<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

21.20<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Total<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

100.00<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

100.00<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Fonte : Willer, H e Yussef, M (2004) e (2005)<\/strong> <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

A pesquisa do relat\u00f3rio de 2005 relaciona na tabela 4, por ordem decrescente de extens\u00e3o de \u00e1rea, os principais pa\u00edses e o percentual da \u00e1rea agricultada de cada um, ocupada com agricultura org\u00e2nica. Nessa tabela, s\u00e3o destacados apenas aqueles pa\u00edses que possuem mais de 24 mil hectares com atividades org\u00e2nicas, tomando como base o relat\u00f3rio de 2005 (\u00e1reas referentes a 2004). No sentido de mostrar a evolu\u00e7\u00e3o das \u00e1reas desses pa\u00edses em rela\u00e7\u00e3o aos anos anteriores, inclu\u00edram-se na tabela 4 os dados referentes aos anos de 2000 e 2002.<\/p>\n

O Brasil ocupava a d\u00e9cima quinta posi\u00e7\u00e3o em extens\u00e3o de \u00e1rea, no relat\u00f3rio de 2001 referente ao ano 2000, dispondo de cerca de 100 mil hectares. No \u00faltimo relat\u00f3rio, subiu para a quinta posi\u00e7\u00e3o em virtude da agrega\u00e7\u00e3o das \u00e1reas de pastagens org\u00e2nicas que n\u00e3o tinham sido inclu\u00eddas anteriormente.<\/p>\n

J\u00e1 em rela\u00e7\u00e3o ao percentual de \u00e1rea com agricultura org\u00e2nica frente \u00e0 \u00e1rea total agricultada do pa\u00eds, a posi\u00e7\u00e3o do Brasil sofreu pequena altera\u00e7\u00e3o para menos. O Pa\u00eds caiu para o q\u00fcinquag\u00e9simo s\u00e9timo lugar, como decorr\u00eancia de sua imensa \u00e1rea, que se localizava em quadrag\u00e9simo nono lugar no ano 2000. A prop\u00f3sito dessas altera\u00e7\u00f5es, estima-se que o Brasil dispunha em 2001 de cerca de 203,18 mil hectares com culturas org\u00e2nicas e 600 mil hectares com pastagens org\u00e2nicas, no total de 803,18 mil hectares.3 Essa informa\u00e7\u00e3o foi inclu\u00edda no relat\u00f3rio de 2005, o que colocou o Pa\u00eds nas primeiras posi\u00e7\u00f5es dessa classifica\u00e7\u00e3o mundial quanto a \u00e1rea.<\/p>\n

O n\u00famero de hectares conduzidos organicamente no Brasil, que correspondia a 0,63% dos 15,814 milh\u00f5es de hectares da \u00e1rea total agricultada organicamente no mundo em 2000, aumentou para cerca de 3,03% dos 26,456 milh\u00f5es de hectares identificados em 2004 (tabela 4). Essa situa\u00e7\u00e3o mostra que a agricultura org\u00e2nica brasileira apresenta ainda uma participa\u00e7\u00e3o reduzid\u00edssima na agricultura org\u00e2nica mundial, mas est\u00e1 crescendo de modo exponencial nos \u00faltimos anos.<\/p>\n

Esse crescimento exponencial ocorre tamb\u00e9m no \u00e2mbito mundial. Considerando que a \u00e1rea total agricult\u00e1vel no mundo seja de 4,131 milh\u00f5es de hectares, o fato de a \u00e1rea com org\u00e2nicos passar de cerca de 0,38 % em 2000 para cerca de 0,64% em 2004 confirma esta tend\u00eancia.<\/p>\n

O relat\u00f3rio de 2005 de Willer e Youssef observa que a maior parte das \u00e1reas org\u00e2nicas est\u00e1 localizada apenas em dois pa\u00edses: Austr\u00e1lia, com 11,3 milh\u00f5es de hectares; e Argentina, com 2,8 milh\u00f5es de hectares. Podem se acrescentar os mais de um milh\u00e3o de hectares da It\u00e1lia, mas a maior parte se refere a pastagens. \u00c9 prov\u00e1vel que a \u00e1rea efetivamente cultivada no mundo com agricultura org\u00e2nica propriamente dita pode estar reduzida a menos da metade dos 26 milh\u00f5es de hectares ao se exclu\u00edrem as pastagens.<\/p>\n

Tabela 4 \u2013 \u00c1rea com agricultura org\u00e2nica em pa\u00edses e no mundo (fev. 2001 e fev. 2005)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Pa\u00edses<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00c1rea com agricultura org\u00e2nica (hectares)<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Ano<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2001<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2002<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2004<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Austr\u00e1lia<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

7.654.924\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

10.500.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

11.300.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Argentina<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3.000.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3.192.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.800.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

It\u00e1lia<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

958.687<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1.230.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1.052.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

USA<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

900.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

950.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

930.810<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Brasil<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

100.000<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

275.576<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

803.180<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Uruguai<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1.300<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

678.481<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

760.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Alemanha<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

452.279<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

632.165<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

734.027<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Espanha<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

352.164<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

485.079<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

725.254<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Reino Unido<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

380.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

679.631<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

695.619<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Chile<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.700<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

273.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

646.150<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Fran\u00e7a<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

316.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

419,750<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

550.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Canad\u00e1<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

188.195<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

430.600<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

516.111<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

M\u00e9xico<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

85.676<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

141.154<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

400.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

\u00c1ustria<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

287.900<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

285.500<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

328.803<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Rep\u00fablica Checa<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

110.756<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

218.114<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

254.995<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Gr\u00e9cia<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

21.280<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

31.118<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

244.455<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Su\u00e9cia<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

174.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

193.611<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

207.488<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Finl\u00e2ndia<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

147.423<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

147943<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

159.987<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Dinamarca<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

146.685<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

174.600<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

165.148<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Peru<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

12.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

84.918<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

150.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Portugal<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

47.974<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

70.857<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

120.729<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Hungria<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

34.500<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

105.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

113.816<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Su\u00ed\u00e7a<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

84.271<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

102.999<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

110.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Turquia<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

18.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

57.001<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

103.190<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Paraguai<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

19.218<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

61.556<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

91.414<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Eslov\u00e1quia<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

60.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

58.706<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

54.478<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Pol\u00f4nia<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

11.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

44.886<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

49.928<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Latvia<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

48.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Holanda<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

27.820<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

38.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

41.865<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Nova Zel\u00e2ndia<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

11.500<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

63.438<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

40.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Noruega<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

18.773<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

26.673<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

38.176<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Tun\u00edsia<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

8.000<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

18.255<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

33.500<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Irlanda<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

32.478<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

30.070<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

28.514<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

B\u00e9lgica<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

18.572<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

22.410<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

24.163<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Outros<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

98.412<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Total<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

15.813.817<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

22.811.267<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

26.456.270<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Em 2000, os pa\u00edses classificados entre os primeiros dez em \u00e1rea foram Austr\u00e1lia, Argentina, It\u00e1lia, EUA, Alemanha, Espanha, Reino Unido, Fran\u00e7a, \u00c1ustria e Canad\u00e1. J\u00e1 em 2002, os dez primeiros lugares foram ocupados por: Austr\u00e1lia, Argentina, It\u00e1lia, EUA, Uruguai, Espanha, Alemanha, Reino Unido, Canad\u00e1 e Fran\u00e7a (o Uruguai substituiu a \u00c1ustria). E em 2004 a classifica\u00e7\u00e3o foi a seguinte: Austr\u00e1lia, Argentina, It\u00e1lia, EUA, Brasil, Uruguai, Alemanha, Espanha, Reino Unido e Chile (tabela 4). Essas mudan\u00e7as deveram-se \u00e0 inclus\u00e3o das \u00e1reas de pastagens do Brasil e, provavelmente, a alguma pesquisa que identificou as \u00e1reas com plantio org\u00e2nico do Uruguai e do Chile.<\/p>\n

Destacam-se tamb\u00e9m os pa\u00edses que apresentaram mais de um por cento de atividades org\u00e2nicas em rela\u00e7\u00e3o \u00e0 \u00e1rea total do pa\u00eds (tabela 5).<\/p>\n

Tabela 5 – Pa\u00edses com \u00e1rea percentual com produ\u00e7\u00e3o org\u00e2nica em rela\u00e7\u00e3o \u00e0 \u00e1rea total agricultada do pa\u00eds maior que 1% e total dos demais, relat\u00f3rios de 2001, 2003 e 2004<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Ano Pa\u00eds<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

% de \u00e1rea com agricultura org\u00e2nica (h\u00e1)<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

2000<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2002<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2004<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Liechtenstein<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

17,97<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

17,00<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

26,40<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

\u00c1ustria<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

8,43<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

11,30<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

12,90<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Su\u00ed\u00e7a<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

7,87<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

9,70<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

10,27<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Finl\u00e2ndia<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6,79<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6,60<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

7,22<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

It\u00e1lia<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6,46<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

7,94<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6,86<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Su\u00e9cia<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5,60<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6,30<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6,80<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Gr\u00e9cia<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0,61<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0,60<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6,24<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Dinamarca<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5,46<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6,51<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6,20<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Rep\u00fablica Checa<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3,15<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5,09<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5,97<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Eslov\u00e9nia<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0,38<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0,67<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4,60<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Est\u00f4nia<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0,28<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

–<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4,59<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Reino Unido<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2,40<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3,96<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4,42<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Alemanha<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2,64<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3,70<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4,30<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Uruguai<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0,01<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4,00<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4,00<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Noruega<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1,84<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2,62<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3,68<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Portugal<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1,26<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1,80<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3,17<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Costa Rica<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

–<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2,00<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3,11<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Espanha<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1,37<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1,66<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2,84<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Austr\u00e1lia<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1,62<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2,31<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2,48<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Eslov\u00e1quia<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2,45<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2,40<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2,43<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Holanda<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1,39<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1,94<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2,17<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Luxemburgo<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0,79<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1,71<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2,00<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Hungria<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0,56<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1,80<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1,94<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Fran\u00e7a<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1,12<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1,40<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1,86<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

B\u00e9lgica<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1,34<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1,61<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1,73<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Argentina<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1,77<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1,89<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1,70<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Chile<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0,02<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1,50<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1,50<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Uganda<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0,06<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1,39<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1,39<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Belize<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

–<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1,30<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1,30<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Canad\u00e1<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0,25<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0,58<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1,30<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Bol\u00edvia<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0,02<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0,06<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1,04<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Rep. Cor\u00e9ia<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0,04<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0,05<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1,03<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Observa\u00e7\u00f5es: 1) os demais pa\u00edses possuem menos de um porcento de \u00e1rea org\u00e2nica pelo relat\u00f3rio de 2005 de Willer e Yussef; 2) o Brasil no relat\u00f3rio relativo ao ano 2000 ocupava a quadrag\u00e9sima nona posi\u00e7\u00e3o com 0,04 %; no ano 2002, a sexag\u00e9sima sexta posi\u00e7\u00e3o com 0,08%; e em 2004 a q\u00fcinquag\u00e9sima s\u00e9tima posi\u00e7\u00e3o, com 0,23 % de \u00e1rea org\u00e2nica em rela\u00e7\u00e3o \u00e0 estimativa de \u00e1rea total agricultada do pa\u00eds.<\/p>\n

Fonte adaptado de Willer e Yussef (2001)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Pode se concluir com as palavras de Urs Niggli, diretor do FiBL (Instituto de Pesquisa em Agricultura Org\u00e2nica): “A agricultura org\u00e2nica desempenhar\u00e1 um importante papel no direcionamento da agricultura europ\u00e9ia e do mundo. Para explorar seu potencial, \u00e9 necess\u00e1rio o aumento das atividades em pesquisa em agricultura org\u00e2nica”.4<\/p>\n

1 Estes s\u00e3o os documentos mais completos sobre esse assunto at\u00e9 o presente. As estimativas sobre as dimens\u00f5es e caracter\u00edsticas do mercado mundial de produtos agr\u00edcolas de origem org\u00e2nica ainda s\u00e3o bastante prec\u00e1rias. Na maioria dos pa\u00edses, as estruturas oficiais que levantam dados estat\u00edsticos n\u00e3o incluem ou incluem marginalmente quest\u00f5es sobre o sistema org\u00e2nico de produ\u00e7\u00e3o.<\/p>\n

2 Trading opportunities for organic food products from developing countries: strengthening research and policy making capacity on trade and environment in developing countries United Nations Conference onTrade And Developement (UNCTAD) New York and Geneva, January 2004. Dispon\u00edvel em http:\/\/r0.unctad.org\/trade_env\/test1\/publications\/organic.pdf?docid=4502%2B%22ItemID=2068. Acessado em 05\/09\/05.<\/p>\n

3 ORMOND, J. G. P. ; De PAULA, S. R.L. : FAVARET FILHO, P. ; ROCHA, L. T. M. “Agricultura org\u00e2nica: quando o passado \u00e9 futuro” pode ser visto em BNDES Setorial, Rio de Janeiro, n. 15, p. 3-34, mar. 2002 ou em: http:\/\/www.bndes.gov.br\/conhecimento\/bnset\/set1501.pdf acessado em 05\/09\/05<\/p>\n

Artigo registrado no CCTC-IEA sob n\u00famero HP-79\/2005<\/p>\n

Sites para consulta:<\/strong>
http:\/\/www.organicexpo.com\/2005_site\/stats.shtml<\/a>
www.ota.com<\/a>.
http:\/\/www.theorganicpages.com\/topo\/abertura.html<\/a>
http:\/\/www.theorganicreport.org\/<\/a>
http:\/\/www.soel.de\/inhalte\/publikationen\/s\/s_74_06.pdf<\/a>
http:\/\/www.fao.org\/documents\/show_cdr.asp?url_file=\/DOCREP\/005\/Y4252E\/Y4252E00.HTM<\/a>
http:\/\/www.ifoam.org\/<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Autor Richard Domingues Dulley
\nTrabalho publicado em 08\/09\/2005<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/planetaorganico.agropecuaria.ws\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5388"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/planetaorganico.agropecuaria.ws\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/planetaorganico.agropecuaria.ws\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/planetaorganico.agropecuaria.ws\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/planetaorganico.agropecuaria.ws\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5388"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/planetaorganico.agropecuaria.ws\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5388\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/planetaorganico.agropecuaria.ws\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5388"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/planetaorganico.agropecuaria.ws\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5388"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/planetaorganico.agropecuaria.ws\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5388"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}